The world of decentralized exchanges (DEXs) can feel like trying to tell identical twins apart at first glance. At the very first glance, Uniswap and SushiSwap might look like the same product but in different packaging.
Both platforms let you swap tokens without a middleman, provide liquidity to earn fees, and participate in the decentralized finance revolution. No sign-ups are needed, no KYC, and last but not least, no central authority controlling your funds. But here’s where things get interesting: their approaches to fees, governance, rewards, and multi-chain support diverge in ways that matter for your bottom line.
This guide cuts through the complexity to show you exactly how you can differentiate between Uniswap vs SushiSwap stack up in 2025. We will cover all the topics, from comparing trading fees and liquidity depth to user experience and security track records. Whether you’re a DeFi veteran optimizing yield strategies or a newcomer making your first DEX trade, you’ll discover which platform aligns with your goals. And why would you want to use either of these sometimes?
What is Uniswap?
Uniswap is the OG of automated market makers (AMMs) that revolutionized cryptocurrency trading. It was launched in November 2018 by Hayden Adams. Not only did it flip crypto trading on its head, but it also introduced using liquidity pools and a simple formula to allow anyone to swap tokens instantly through Uniswap.
Here’s how Uniswap works: the liquidity providers (LPs) deposit equal amounts of two tokens. Let’s say ETH and USDC are put into a pool. Traders swap against that pool. And prices automatically adjust based on the token ratio. The formula (x*y = k) keeps trades going effortlessly. Moreover, it also ensures liquidity. However, large trades can shift prices significantly. In return, LPs earn a cut of the trading fees, proportional to their share of the pool.
Since then, Uniswap has evolved through multiple versions.
o V1 (2018): Proved the concept by enabling the ETH-ERC swaps
o V2 (2020): Allowed ERC-20 to ERC-20 trading directly
o V3 (2021): Introduced concentrated liquidity, letting LPs allocate capital within specific price ranges for up to 4000× efficiency
o V4 (coming in 2025): Will unlock customizable pools with hooks for advanced strategies & opening the door for more flexible trading
As of now, Uniswap handles billions in daily volume and holds more than $4 billion in total value locked (TVL). Hence, Uniswap remains the undisputed DEX leader.
Pros
● Highest liquidity depth > tighter spreads & less slippage
● Industry-standard protocol > nearly every DeFi application, wallet and aggregator supports it
● Concentrated liquidity in V3 > makes LPs far more capital efficient
● No token required > no tokens are required to use the platform
● Battle-tested security > with multiple audits and no major hacks since launch
● Professional-grade features > like limit orders and advanced position management
● Strong regulatory position > Viewed as the most regulator friendly & transparent DEX
Cons
● Higher gas fees > especially on Ethereum mainnet, where most of its liquidity sits
● Complex for beginners > steeper learning curve for beginners, especially V3’s concentrated LP positions
● Limited multi-chain presence > compared to competitors spreading everywhere
● No native token rewards > for liquidity providers beyond trading fees
● Impermanent loss risks > can be severe in V3’s concentrated positions
● Less community features > focusing purely on trading over community building
What is SushiSwap?
SushiSwap’s origin story is one of the spiciest in the history of DeFi. It was launched in August 2020 by the anonymous “Chef Nomi”. It pulled off what became known as the “vampire attack” on Uniswap. Sushi basically forked Uniswap code but added an incentive. SUSHI token rewards for all the liquidity providers. This aggressive strategy lured over $1 billion in liquidity from Uniswap within days.
SushiSwap operates on the AMM model at its core, allowing users to trade against liquidity pools. It also evolved into a full DeFi toolbox instead of just focusing on the swaps. SushiSwap introduced lending (Kashi), yield farming via MasterChef, limit orders through OpenOcean, token launches with MISO, and cross-chain bridges.
Oh, and here is another big difference. Sushi went multi-chain earlier. At the same time, Uniswap stuck with Ethereum and a few Layer-2s. SushiSwap is deployed on over 14 blockchains, starting from Avalanche to Fantom, and then BNB Chain. This “be everywhere” approach trades Uniswap’s depth for SushiSwap’s breadth. SushiSwap’s got a decent-sized community, with around $400 million locked in (that’s TVL, or total value locked). It’s not as massive as Uniswap, but it’s still got a loyal following that loves its rewards, features, and the fact that it works on a bunch of different blockchains.
Pros
● Multi-chain deployment > across 14+ blockchains for lower fees and more options
● SUSHI token rewards > provide additional yield beyond trading fees
● Comprehensive DeFi suite >including lending, limit orders, and yield optimization
● xSUSHI staking > lets holders earn platform revenue share
● Active governance > where SUSHI holders directly shape platform development
● Lower fees on alt-chains > making small trades more economical
● Innovative features > like BentoBox for capital efficiency and Trident framework
Cons
● Lower liquidity > especially on the Ethereum mainnet, where it matters most
● Fragmented liquidity > spread thin across multiple chains
● Complex tokenomics > with emissions that can dilute SUSHI value
● Past governance drama > including the Chef Nomi exit scandal
● Smaller developer ecosystem > compared to Uniswap’s extensive integrations
● Higher smart contract risk > from more features, meaning more potential vulnerabilities
● Less institutional adoption > viewed as riskier than Uniswap
How are the Two DEX Exchanges Similar?
Before diving into what sets Uniswap and SushiSwap apart. It is worth noting why they are often talked about together. At their core, both platforms are built on similar architecture and principles that shape the world of decentralized exchange (DEX) trading.
· Both Uniswap and SushiSwap are DEXs (Decentralized Exchanges) built on the same idea, with no middlemen in sight, simply through smart contracts
· They run on the AMM model (automated market maker), so trades happen with liquidity pools instead of traditional order books
· Price discovery works the same for both, using the constant product formula to make swaps fast and reliable
· No KYC or sign-up needed because your wallet is your account
· Both are non-custodial, you always keep control of your funds until you start trading
· They support ERC-20 tokens and follow similar smart contract setups
· Users can do the same things, like swap tokens, add/remove liquidity, and earn fees
· Liquidity providers get a share of trading fees on both platforms
· Each has its own governance token (UNI for Uniswap, SUSHI for SushiSwap) for voting on changes
· The user experience feels the same: connect wallet > pick tokens > enter amount > confirm swap
· If you have used one, you can easily use the other without much learning curve.
Uniswap vs. SushiSwap: Key Differences Explained
They both share similar roots. But over time, these decentralized exchanges (DEXs) have developed their own unique features and strengths. And that is how it makes them suited for different types of users and trading needs.
To figure out the key differences between Uniswap and SushiSwap, let us check out the table below:
| Feature | Uniswap | SushiSwap |
| Trading Fees | 0.05%, 0.3%, or 1% (pool-dependent) | 0.3% fixed (0.25% to LPs, 0.05% to xSUSHI) |
| Blockchain Support | Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, BNB | 14+ chains, including Avalanche, Fantom, Harmony |
| Total Value Locked | ~$4 billion | ~$400 million |
| Daily Volume | $1-2 billion | $50-150 million |
| Governance Token | UNI (no staking) | SUSHI (xSUSHI staking for revenue) |
| Additional Features | Concentrated liquidity, NFT marketplace | Lending, limit orders, yield farming |
| Mobile App | Yes (wallet + trading) | No native app |
| Token Rewards | None (fees only) | SUSHI emissions for LPs |
1. Fees Difference
Uniswap V3 lets liquidity providers pick their own fee tier:
– 0.05% fee for stable pairs (low risk, low volatility assets)
– 0.3% fee for standard pairs (typical assets with moderate volatility)
– 1% fee for exotic pairs (high risk, high volatility assets)
This way, they can balance volume versus volatility, and all the fees go straight back. Though SushiSwap takes a little different approach, as it has a fixed 0.3% fee on all swaps.
– 0.25% goes to liquidity providers (LPs)
– 0.05% goes to xSUSHI stakers (SUSHI holders who lock tokens for platform revenue share)
For traders, the gap isn’t huge, but it matters. On Uniswap, the extremely low 0.05% fee for stablecoins often makes large trades significantly cheaper. SushiSwap’s flat fee is easier to understand, but can end up costing more at times. That said, SushiSwap is on more blockchains, so lower gas fees there can sometimes balance things out.
2. Supported Blockchains
Uniswap sticks to a focused strategy. It runs on Ethereum, plus a few big Layer-2s like Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, and recently BNB Chain. By limiting itself to major networks, it keeps liquidity deep and features consistent across chains.
SushiSwap takes the opposite route with a go-everywhere strategy. Besides Ethereum, it’s on Avalanche, Fantom, Harmony, Moonbeam, and many more. This gives traders cheaper options on networks where gas fees are just pennies instead of dollars.
The trade-off? Uniswap’s pools are deeper on the chains it supports, while SushiSwap spreads out thinner but reaches a broader range of ecosystems. Uniswap usually wins if you are trading big tokens on Ethereum. If you are looking for flexibility across multiple chains or want to save on fees, SushiSwap might be the better choice for you.
3. Liquidity and Volume
Uniswap is way ahead in size. It holds around $4 billion in locked funds, compared to about $400 million on SushiSwap. That’s ten times more liquidity. The trading activity shows a similar gap: Uniswap moves $1–2 billion daily, while SushiSwap handles approximately $50–150 million.
This liquidity advantage translates to real benefits. Uniswap’s larger pools mean big trades face less slippage. A $100k swap might shift prices 0.5% on Uniswap versus 2% on SushiSwap. Its V3 liquidity concentration makes this even stronger.
Still, SushiSwap shines on chains where Uniswap isn’t present, like Avalanche or Fantom. Uniswap might be the top pick for big-name pairs with tons of liquidity, but SushiSwap often comes out on top when you’re dealing with smaller tokens or need access to alternative blockchains.
4. Governance Tokens (UNI vs SUSHI)
Uniswap’s UNI token is all about governance as holders get to vote on big decisions. But they don’t get any direct benefits like the staking rewards. The token’s value is basically tied to Uniswap’s prospects. On the other hand, SushiSwap’s SUSHI token works in a totally different way. Holders can stake it for xSUSHI and earn a cut of trading fees, creating passive income. It also has broader governance powers over the protocol.
In short, UNI keeps things clear and simple. On the other hand, SUSHI adds utility and rewards but needs more active management.
The tokenomics also reflect different philosophies. Uniswap’s minimalist approach avoids the complexity and potential security issues of staking. SushiSwap’s model fosters stronger community ownership and requires active token management. Neither approach is definitively better. So it depends on your choice, whether you prefer simplicity or some active participation.
5. Feature Differences Other Than Swaps
Uniswap focuses purely on swaps. It adds features like concentrated liquidity, range orders, and even an NFT marketplace—but all designed to improve trading quality. Its strength lies in polish and reliability, making it the go-to choice for clean, professional-grade token swaps.
SushiSwap, on the other hand, tries to be a full DeFi hub. It offers lending (Kashi), vaults (BentoBox), token launches (MISO), yield farming, and many more. This “all-in-one” setup is ambitious but can sometimes feel less streamlined. Still, it attracts users who want more than just swapping in one place.
Or we can just put it into simple words. Uniswap specializes in swaps, and SushiSwap offers a broad DeFi suite. You can choose the one that fits your preferences the best.
6. How do The User Experience and Interface Compare
Uniswap keeps things simple. The swap screen is clean and fast. All you have to do is pick tokens, enter an amount, and swap. Even advanced features, like V3 positions, remain fairly easy to follow, and its mobile app features the same smooth design.
SushiSwap packs in far more features. SushiSwap’s interface is like a mixed bag. The swap feature is straightforward, but when you venture into lending, farming, or analytics, things can get pretty complex. Power users will love having all these tools in one place, but newbies might find it a bit overwhelming. Uniswap, on the other hand, feels more refined and user-friendly, while SushiSwap offers a lot more features, but with a steeper learning curve.
7. Security and Regulation
When it comes to security, Uniswap has a solid reputation, having undergone thorough audits. And its simple design helps minimize risks. Uniswap Labs also works closely with regulators, which might make it more appealing to institutional investors.
On the other hand, SushiSwap has had a more checkered past, with its founder’s early actions raising some eyebrows. At the same time, it has not been hacked. But its broader feature set could create more vulnerabilities.
Governance-wise, SushiSwap’s decentralized nature makes it more resistant to censorship, but also a little more unpredictable. On the other hand, Uniswap’s focus on compliance might give it an edge with institutions. But SushiSwap’s autonomy could be fruitful for some users.
8. Speed & Transaction Costs
Protocol fees are only part of the picture, as the gas costs often matter more. On Ethereum, both Uniswap and SushiSwap swaps can cost $20–$100 depending on congestion. And Uniswap V3’s advanced features might be more likely to use more gas.
SushiSwap’s edge comes from its multi-chain presence. On Polygon or Fantom, a swap might cost just a few cents compared to tens of dollars on Ethereum. But for small trades, these savings far outweigh protocol fees.
Speed also depends on the chain and not entirely on the DEX. Ethereum blocks may take around 12–15 seconds. However, SushiSwap on Avalanche or Fantom can confirm in 1–2 seconds, making it better for faster trades/arbitrage.
9. Popularity & Market Share
Uniswap is the leader in decentralized exchanges (DEXs). It handles most trades, sets token prices, and works with many DeFi projects. New tokens often start on Uniswap, and traders use it by default. It’s the standard in the industry.
However, SushiSwap is smaller, with around 5-10% of the market. However, it boasts a loyal community that appreciates its rewards, additional features, and support for multiple blockchains. SushiSwap is for those who want more than just simple trades. Uniswap will likely stay dominant due to its size, but SushiSwap can still succeed as a feature-rich alternative. Both platforms can coexist, serving different users.
10. Rewards and Incentives
Uniswap keeps things simple as liquidity providers only earn from trading fees. There are no extra rewards, no farming math, and no inflation. What you earn depends directly on the volume of trading and the fee tier you are in. It’s straightforward and reliable, though the returns may be lower compared to others.
SushiSwap takes a different path by adding SUSHI token rewards on top of trading fees. Providers not only get 0.25% of trading activity but also SUSHI tokens. This can greatly increase yields, especially in pools the community decides to boost.
The difference comes down to short-term gains versus long-term stability. Uniswap gives you a stable income from trading fees, which is reliable. SushiSwap, on the other hand, offers higher rewards initially, but there is a catch. As time moves forward, those rewards might not be as sustainable due to decreasing token supply and potential selling pressure that could impact SUSHI’s value.
How Do Uniswap and SushiSwap Compare With PancakeSwap?
The PancakeSwap vs Uniswap vs SushiSwap comparison adds another dimension. And that is the BNB Chain factor. Think of PancakeSwap as Uniswap’s cousin on the BNB Chain, but with a twist. It offers token rewards similar to SushiSwap. Launched in September 2020, it quickly became BNB Chain’s dominant DEX by copying what worked and adapting to its ecosystem.
PancakeSwap’s main advantage is pricing. Its trades cost $0.10-0.50 versus $20-100 on Ethereum. This makes it perfect for small traders, gaming tokens, and yield farming, where frequent transactions eat into profits elsewhere. PancakeSwap has over $2 billion locked in (that’s a lot!), making it bigger than SushiSwap. Although it only works on BNB Chain and Apto,
The tradeoffs are clear as PancakeSwap offers cheap, fast trade with decent liquidity. But you are limited to BNB Chain’s ecosystem. It lacks Uniswap’s institutional liquidity and Ethereum’s asset variety. It also lacks SushiSwap’s multi-chain reach and advanced features. PancakeSwap excels in its niche with a volume. It has a low value trading on BNB Chain but doesn’t compete directly with Ethereum-focused DEXs for serious DeFi users.
SushiSwap vs. Uniswap: What is the Right Choice Then?
The Uniswap vs. SushiSwap decision is not about which one is the best bet. It is about matching platform strengths to your specific needs. Here’s when each platform makes sense:
Choose Uniswap when:
● Trading large amounts where liquidity depth matters
● Focusing on major pairs like ETH/USDC or WBTC/ETH
● Wanting the most secure and battle-tested platform
● Providing concentrated liquidity for maximum capital efficiency
● Needing professional-grade features and analytics
● Prioritizing simplicity and minimal risk
Choose SushiSwap when:
● Operating on alternative chains like Avalanche or Fantom
● Wanting additional yield through SUSHI rewards
● Using DeFi features beyond swapping (lending, farming)
● Trading smaller amounts where gas costs matter more
● Seeking governance participation through xSUSHI staking
● Exploring new tokens and experimental features
Use both platforms when:
● Arbitraging price differences between DEXs
● Maximizing yield by comparing APYs
● Accessing different liquidity pools
● Diversifying smart contract risk
● Optimizing for specific trading pairs
The reality is that most serious DeFi users have both in their toolkit. Uniswap is widely used for major trades on Ethereum. And SushiSwap is used for alt-chain access and yield farming. Think of them as two different tools in your toolbox; each one is great for specific tasks. They are not really competing. They are more like partners who help you get the job done in the best way possible.
Learn More About DeFi and DEX With Dypto Crypto
Ready to dive deeper into the world of decentralized exchanges and DeFi? The Uniswap vs SushiSwap comparison is just the beginning of your DeFi journey. At Dypto Crypto, we transform complex DeFi concepts into actionable knowledge that helps you make smarter decisions.
Our comprehensive DeFi section covers everything from yield farming strategies to impermanent loss protection, from liquidity provision to advanced trading techniques. We break down new protocols, analyze farming opportunities, and help you navigate the ever-evolving DeFi landscape with confidence.
Join Dypto Crypto today and become part of a community that’s mastering DeFi together. You can get all the exclusive insights, real-time alerts on new opportunities, and expert guidance on maximizing your returns while managing risks. It doesn’t matter if you are team Uniswap or team SushiSwap, or are not well aware of either of these two. We will help you level up your DeFi game and take it to the next level.
The sign-up is totally free, so what are you waiting for? Join our Newsletter and discover why thousands of DeFi enthusiasts call Dypto Crypto their home for decentralized finance education. Your journey from DeFi curious to DeFi confident starts here!
FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)
Q: Which is better, SushiSwap or Uniswap?
A: We can’t pick a favorite because they both excel at different things. Uniswap is superior for large trades on major pairs, offering deeper liquidity, tighter spreads, and proven security. It’s the professional choice for serious traders.
SushiSwap is better suited for multi-chain access, yield farming, and users seeking additional features beyond simple swapping. It offers more ways to earn through SUSHI rewards and xSUSHI staking. For Ethereum mainnet trading, Uniswap usually provides better execution. For alternative chains or maximizing yield, SushiSwap often emerges as the winner. Most experienced users use both platforms strategically.
Q: Are fees lower on SushiSwap or Uniswap?
A: When it comes to trading fees, Uniswap and SushiSwap have their own pros and cons. Uniswap can be cheaper for stable pairs (0.05% fee), but SushiSwap’s fee is always 0.3%. However, the real cost difference comes from “gas” fees, which are the costs associated with making a transaction on the blockchain.
On Ethereum, both platforms charge similar gas fees (around $20-$100 per trade). But SushiSwap has an edge because it’s available on other blockchains like Polygon and Fantom, where gas fees are super low (like $0.10 per trade!). This makes SushiSwap a better choice for small trades.
On the other hand, if you’re making big trades, Uniswap’s flexible fees and huge liquidity (tons of buyers and sellers) often give you a better deal. The gas fee doesn’t hurt as much when you’re trading large amounts. For large trades, Uniswap’s system can work in your favor.
Q: Can I stake tokens on Uniswap?
A: Sadly, Uniswap doesn’t offer token staking. UNI tokens are purely for governance with no staking mechanism or revenue share. Liquidity providers earn trading fees only, not additional token rewards. This is by design. Uniswap maintains a minimalist approach, avoiding tokenomics complexity.
If you want staking yields, SushiSwap’s xSUSHI staking offers a platform revenue share, or you can explore other DeFi protocols, too. Some users prefer Uniswap’s simplicity, while others want SushiSwap’s additional earning opportunities.
Q: Are both platforms legal in the US?
A: Both Uniswap and SushiSwap are still available for US users in 2025, but crypto regulations keep changing. Uniswap has been working more closely with regulators and has removed some tokens to follow the rules, even though they have received warnings from the SEC.
SushiSwap works differently since it’s more decentralized without one main company running it, which creates different legal situations. You don’t need to verify your identity on either platform, which means anyone can use them. Just keep in mind that crypto rules change fast, so it’s good to stay updated on what’s happening.
Q: Which platform is more beginner-friendly?
A: Uniswap has very few features, but it is beginner-friendly. Its interface is cleaner, the documentation is clearer, and the process is more straightforward. The mobile app makes starting even easier. There’s less to learn, just swapping and basic liquidity provision. On the other hand, SushiSwap’s different features can overwhelm newcomers. However, its interface has improved significantly.
For absolute beginners, start with Uniswap to understand DEX basics, then explore SushiSwap’s additional features once you are comfortable. Both have learning curves compared to centralized exchanges. But Uniswap’s simplicity gives it the edge for first-time users.
About the Author
