Due to congestion, using Ethereum has become a costly and time-consuming process for most cryptocurrency traders and developers. Enter the magical world of Layer 2 scaling solutions, where speed is high and costs are low.
Layer 2 scaling is the new future of crypto systems, as it allows better and cheaper access to Ethereum. With Optimism and Arbitrum standing at the forefront, the mainstream adoption of layer 2 rollups is ramping up dramatically.
While there is a massive competition in the world of layer 2, we will be focusing on the two top dogs, Optimism and Arbitrum. We will help you understand what rollups are in layer 2 scaling and how these systems can be employed to increase the efficiency of your transactions and dApps.
What Are Optimism and Arbitrum?
Optimism and Arbitrum are two of the most prominent Layer 2 solutions designed to scale Ethereum. Before diving into each solution, let’s understand what a layer 2 solution is.
Layer 2 solutions are built on top of Ethereum (Layer 1) to handle transactions without requiring Ethereum to be involved first. They process transactions off-chain and then post summaries back to Ethereum to avoid layer 1 congestion. This decreases fees and increases transaction speed in addition to enhanced scalability. This is all achieved without compromising Ethereum’s security.
As both Optimism and Arbitrum are layer 2 solutions, they use the same technology in addition to a special technique called “optimistic rollups.” In this method, transactions are bundled (rolled up) off-chain, and then these bundles are submitted to Ethereum with a cryptographic proof.
Ethereum optimistically assumes that these transactions are valid unless someone challenges them. In case of a challenge, the roolup runs a fraud-proof to verify the correctness of the challenged transaction.
While Ethereum is extremely powerful, it can be bogged down due to high demand. Both Optimism and Arbitrum help Ethereum scale without sacrificing any of its core features. Let’s dive into both layer 2 solutions to see how they work.
What is Optimism?
Optimism is one of the best layer 2 scaling solutions for Ethereum. It aims to make the blockchain technology more accessible and affordable, without compromising on security and decentralization.
Optimism Collective develops optimism, and its mission is to scale Ethereum while funding public goods. It redistributes a portion of network revenue to developers and builders who contribute to the Ethereum ecosystem. This also aligns with Ethereum’s ethos of decentralization and open collaboration.
Optimism works via optimistic rollups, where transactions are bundled and then sent to the Ethereum network. Ethereum accepts all transactions unless they are challenged. Upon challenge, they are verified by a method known as fraud-proof.
Optimism enables dApps to run more efficiently, thereby making Ethereum more usable for everyday users. Optimism is also fully compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), which allows developers to easily port their apps without major changes.
Optimism has a long-term vision known as the Superchain. It will be a unified network of interoperable layer 2 chains built using the same open-source framework called the OP Stack. As these chains will share the same infrastructure, governance, and security, this will make it easier for users and developers to move across ecosystems without friction.
Optimism stands out from the rest of the layer 2 chains due to its simplicity, interoperability, scalability, and public goods funding.
What is Arbitrum?
Arbitrum is another fan favorite layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum. It is designed to reduce cost and improve transaction speed, while preserving Ethereum’s security and decentralization.
Arbitrum is built around two core technologies, Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova. Arbitrum One is a general-purpose optimistic rollup chain that bundles transactions and posts them all to Ethereum. This allows Arbitrum One to inherit all the security features of L1. It is suitable for DeFi and DEXs.
Arbitrum Nova, on the other hand, uses the AnyTrust Protocol, where data is stored off-chain by a Data Availability Committee (DAC). It assumes that at least one member of DAC is honest, allowing major performance gains for a minor trust tradeoff. It is ultra-cheap with high throughput, and is suitable for high-volume applications like social gaming.
Arbitrum has seen explosive growth with over 1800 developers who have already contributed to it. Its TVL surged from $1 billion to $3 billion, making it one of the highest-value L2s for DeFi. Arbitrum Nova processes more transactions than Ethereum, especially in gaming and social apps.
Arbitrum stands out for its security-first design, full EVM compatibility, multi-chain flexibility to support diverse use cases, developer-friendly tooling, and battle-tested infrastructure.
Optimism vs Arbitrum: How are the Two Similar?
While built by different companies with different goals in mind, both Optimism and Arbitrum share some similarities. These include.
- Technology: Both Optimism and Arbitrum use optimistic Rollups to scale Ethereum.
- Low Costs: They both reduce gas fees by processing transactions off-chain (Ethereum).
- App Compatibility: Both support Ethereum dApps and smart contracts due to full EVM compatibility.
- Security: Both Optimism and Arbitrum use Ethereum’s Layer 1 for final settlement and security.
- Scalability Goals: Both aim to make Ethereum faster and usable for everyone without breaking the bank.
Optimism vs Arbitrum: Key Differences
While Optimism and Arbitrum share a lot of similarities, they have some major differences too due to their varying DNAs. Some of their major differences are highlighted below.
Technology and Fraud-Proof Mechanisms
Optimism uses a single-round fraud-proof that is executed on layer 1 of Ethereum. In the event of a challenge, the entire transaction is re-executed on Ethereum. While this approach is simpler, it is less flexible, more costly, and sometimes slower due to congestion on Ethereum’s L1. Transactions on Optimism are vulnerable to exploits by malicious actors during the challenge window.
On the other hand, Arbitrum employs a multi-round, interactive, and fraud-proof mechanism. It is known as the BoLD Protocol, and instead of re-executing the whole transaction, it breaks the disputed transaction into smaller steps using a bisection method.
The challenger and defender engage in a back-and-forth process on L2 that narrows down the exact point of dispute. Only the final step takes place on Ethereum. Arbitrum features advanced security measures, including Merkle Tree Commitments and Censorship Mitigation Parameters, to protect transactions from malicious actors.
Transaction Fees and Cost Efficiency
While both Optimism and Arbitrum offer low ETH transfer and token swap fees, Arbitrum wins in this round due to it being cheaper than Optimism in both scenarios. Below is a table to highlight the real fees charged by both systems.
| Platform | ETH Transfer Fee (USD) | Token Swap Fees (USD) |
| Optimism | $0.20–$0.30 | $0.40–$0.80 |
| Arbitrum | $0.15–$0.25 | $0.30–$0.70 |
Ecosystem Size and Total Value Locked (TVL)
When it comes to the Total Value Locked, Arbitrum wins by a landslide against Optimism. It has a total of $2.9 billion TVL, which accounts for the 60% market share of L2 systems. It has strong organic growth with anchored liquidity.
On the other hand, Optimism has a $440 million TVL, which is a very small share of the total market. However, it is rapidly expanding via OP Chain and Superchain.
When discussing the ecosystem and dApp adoption, Arbitrum hosts major DeFi players, including Uniswap, GMX, Aave, and Gains Network. It supports custom chains via Orbit, which enables sovereign scalability. Arbitrum has around 330,000 daily active crypto addresses.
Optimism powers the OP Stack and Superchain, which includes chains such as Base and Worldcoin. It has over 68,000 daily active crypto addresses, and it handles over 1.2 million daily transactions.
| Metric | Arbitrum | Optimism |
| Daily DEX Volume | $1.1 billion | Lower but growing |
| User Retention (30-60d) | 35-45% | 35-45% |
| Bridged TVL | >$11 billion | $7.6 billion, including Base |
Governance and Native Tokens (OP vs ARB)
Both OP (Optimism) and ARB (Arbitrum) are non-staking governance tokens, which means they can be used to vote on proposals but can’t secure the network like ETH. Their main differences are.
| Token | Governance Role | Other Functions |
| OP | Voting in Optimism Collective | Supports public goods funding |
| ARB | Voting in Arbitrum DAO | Used for treasury management and protocol upgrades |
When it comes to DAO structure, Optimism has a Two-House system. In the token house, OP holders vote on technical upgrades and governance rules. In the citizen’s house, the focus is on retroactive funding for public goods. Optimism has a seasonal governance model, where OP holders can delegate their votes to trusted representatives.
In Arbitrum, there is a single-house DAO, where the ARB token holders vote on treasury allocations and protocol changes. Arbitrum has formalized rules and procedures for governance. It has a security council that can act quickly in case of an emergency.
The community participation for both systems can be explained with teh help of a simple table.
| Metric | Optimism | Arbitrum |
| Governance | Token + Citizens | ARB holders only |
| Public Goods Focus | Strong via Citizens’ House | Moderate via Treasury Proposals |
| Deligate System | Active and Structured | Optional but less Formalized |
| Proposal Volume | High with seasonal cycles | High with open submission |
Security and Audits
Both Optimism and Arbitrum use optimistic rollup on layer 2 to scale Ethereum. While Arbitrum has active multi-round fraud proofs, they are not yet live on Optimism’s mainnet (cannon in testnet, though). Optimism has centralized sequencer risk of downtime and MEV. Arbitrum carries the same risk, but the funds are retrievable after 7 days.
Optimism uses firms like OpenZeppelin and Trails of Bits for audits. Arbitrum researchers recently disclosed flaws in Optimism’s fraud-proof timers, which could allow the acceptance of fraudulent transactions and the blocking of legitimate ones. However, these issues were addressed on the testnet and are now a part of the cannon upgrade roadmap.
Arbitrum uses firms like Trails of Bits and Quantstamp for protocol audits. Arbitrum’s AnyTrust model ensures safety if even one validator is honest.
Arbitrum currently has a stronger security posture due to live fraudproofs and a more decentralized upgrade path. While Optimism is catching up with its cannon upgrade, but still faces risks from centralized control and inactive fraud-proofs.
Which Network is More Suitable and When?
Choosing between Optimism and Arbitrum depends on your needs and end goals, whether you are a casual user, a DEFI enthusiast, a developer, or an NFT trader.
For everyday users and Coinbase, Optimism is the way to go. It powers Base, Coinbase’s layer 2 chain built on the OP Stack. It is best for simple DeFi tasks, fast & low-cost ETH transfers, and onboarding into web3 via similar interfaces.
For advanced DeFi traders, Arbitrum is the best fit, as it offers deeper liquidity, lower fees, and hosts top-tier DeFi protocols such as Uniswap and Aave. It is best for yield farming, leveraged trading, high-frequency swaps, arbitrage, and access to niche DeFi tools & derivatives.
Optimism is the best fit for developers who are looking for rapid deployment and EVM compatibility. It also offers public good alignment through Optimism Collective. Developers seeking custom chain flexibility and DeFi-native infrastructure should consider Arbitrum.
For NFT creators and gamers, Arbitrum Nova is the best fit as it is optimized for high-volume and low-cost transactions that are perfect for gaming and NFT minting. It is best for NFT drops with thousands of mints, blockchain games needing fast interactions, and social dApps with frequent microtransactions.
What Does the Future Hold for Ethereum Scaling?
The future of Ethereum scaling is shaping up to be modular and fiercely competitive. Rather than a single solution for all, coexistence among optimistic rollups (such as Optimism and Arbitrum), zk-rollups (like zkSync and StarkNet), and hybrid frameworks (like Polygon CDK) is paving the way for the future.
Optimism’s Superchain vision is becoming more important by the day. Built on the OP Stack, it enables multiple Layer 2s to operate as part of a unified network. This modular approach promotes shared tooling and liquidity, enabling cross-chain governance, and supports the creation of permissionless rollups.
Arbitrum’s Orbit framework empowers developers to launch custom chains with tailored features, including the choice between Arbitrum One (rollup) and Nova (AnyTrust), as well as customizing sequencer logic & data availability, and integrating with Ethereum or other L2s.
Orbit chains can run independently or plug into Arbitrum’s ecosystem. This allows sovereign control with Ethereum-grade security, which makes Orbit ideal for enterprise use cases and high-throughput apps.
Zero-knowledge rollups (zk-rollups) are entering the spotlight, promising instant finality, privacy-preserving transactions, and lower fees following the implementation of EIP-4844. Projects like zkSync Era and Polygon zkEVM are pushing the boundaries of cryptographic performance.
zkSync’s ZK Stack and StarkNet’s Cairo-native architecture offer modularity and developer flexibility. While zk-rollups are more complex to build, they’re gaining ground in DeFi and gaming.
Summing It Up
Both Optimism and Arbitrum are powerful Layer 2 solutions built on optimistic rollups. They are designed to make Ethereum faster, cheaper, and more scalable. They both share core traits, like EVM compatibility, reduced gas fees, and reliance on Ethereum’s security. However, they also carry some stark differences.
Optimism has a simple architecture and strong developer experience. It powers the Superchain, which enables modular and interoperable L2s. Optimism is also ideal for Coinbase users, public goods funding, and OP Stack builders. Despite not having a major market share, it is growing fast through chains like Base and Worldcoin.
Arbitrum is an advanced, fraud-proof system with deeper liquidity. It offers Arbitrum One for DeFi and Nova for gaming/social apps. Arbitrum dominates in TVL, DeFi adoption, and low-cost trading, and its Orbit framework enables custom sovereign chains.
If you want to learn more about crypto systems and how layer 2s are poised to change the industry, join Dypto-Crypto right now. We offer institutional-grade How-To guides and a free weekly newsletter that covers all the latest news and happenings of the web3 world.
FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)
Q: Which Layer 2 is cheaper: Arbitrum or Optimism?
A: Arbitrum is cheaper than Optimism for both ETH transfer fees and token swap fees.
Q: Is Arbitrum better for DeFi than Optimism?
A: Yes. Arbitrum is better for DeFi than Optimism due to its higher TVL, low fees, faster settlement, and developer flexibility.
Q: What tokens are used on Optimism and Arbitrum?
A: Optimism uses OP token while Arbitrum’s native token is called ARB. Both OP and ARB are ERC-20 tokens and are used for governance on their respective systems.
Q: Can I use the same wallet on both Arbitrum and Optimism?
A: Yes, you can use wallets like MetaMask and Trust Wallet on both Optimism and Arbitrum.
Q: Can I bridge assets between Arbitrum and Optimism?
A: Yes. You can use a cross-chain bridge that supports layer-2 to layer-2 transfer to bridge assets between Optimism and Arbitrum. Such bridges include Hop Protocol, Synapse Protocol, Celer cBridge, and Allbridge Core.
About the Author
